FIFA decided to use artificial football lawns in the 2015 Women's World Cup, which also attracted huge controversy. Then, regarding the artificial football lawn VS natural turf wins and beats, today's Aojian artificial turf is analyzed from the operating cost and input cost.
The picture below shows the maintenance cost of artificial turf and natural turf for the Okino artificial football lawn. This is a summary of FIFA and has certain credibility.
In addition, the Olympic football lawn also has some drawbacks. In the usual school stadium, we use it is not obvious, but if it is placed in some high-contest competitions, the disadvantages of human grass will appear. First of all, the friction is too big, it is really grass. There is a little difference; secondly, the site has a large elasticity, but the ground is hard, which is the effect of filling the rubber particles. Finally, under high temperature, the grass is hot. In summary, the top events are recommended for real grass and mixed lawns that are popular in Europe and America, such as the Men's World Cup. If the secondary events, the artificial turf, the overall comparison, the advantages are even greater.
Summary: I believe that artificial turf has great advantages in promotion, especially in northern China. It is not suitable for natural grass at all. The consumption of water is not big, the maintenance cost is too high, and the effect is not good. The temperature difference is large, and it is frozen. Too much, really not as good as the vegetable grass we nicknamed.
1. As the manufacturing volume increases, the unit cost will definitely drop.
2. The labor cost of maintenance is much less
3. Non-FIFA-certified artificial turf is definitely much cheaper than natural turf, and can be "comparable" to the natural turf of Chinese vegetable fields.
News Center
中文版
English
ภาษาไทย
About Us
Your current location：